SECTION 8 TITLE 8.0 PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY: A QUIET ENGINE OF RACIAL INJUSTICE IN JIM CROW OF THE NORTH

RACISM IN MINNESOTA

MENTAL HEALTH FAILURES

MENTAL HEALTH MEDICAL FRAUD

PHYSICAL MEDICAL FRAUD

HOUSING FRAUD

WALLS OF SILENCE

SECTION 8 TITLE 8.0 PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY: A QUIET ENGINE OF RACIAL INJUSTICE IN JIM CROW OF THE NORTH

Plausible deniability operates like a shadow in the history of racial injustice, especially in the Northern United States during the Jim Crow era. It gives people in power the ability to sidestep responsibility for discriminatory actions, hiding behind ambiguity and excuses. By disguising intent, plausible deniability allows racism to flourish under a cloak of neutrality and fairness. In "Jim Crow of the North," it functions as an invisible yet devastating tool, enabling exclusion and oppression while preserving the North’s self-image as progressive and equitable.

Subpart 1. A Carefully Built Shield

Plausible deniability thrives on ambiguity. During this era, many forms of discrimination are not written into law but are embedded in daily practices and unspoken rules. Housing covenants, for example, explicitly bar Black families from purchasing homes in certain neighborhoods, yet they are framed as “standard agreements,” not acts of racism. Employers routinely turn away Black applicants, claiming they “aren’t a good fit,” avoiding any mention of racial bias. These justifications aren’t incidental—they are intentional. They create a shield that allows individuals and institutions to enforce systemic racism while denying any wrongdoing. By pointing to policies, market trends, or “common practices,” those involved maintain a façade of fairness, even as their actions deepen racial divides.

Subpart 2. Power Without Fingerprints

The true power of plausible deniability lies in its ability to protect those at the top. Decision-makers—city officials, business leaders, policymakers—delegate the dirty work of discrimination to lower-ranking employees or bureaucratic systems, keeping their own hands clean. Urban planning decisions, for instance, displace Black communities under the banner of “progress” or “urban renewal.” Highways carve through neighborhoods, schools are underfunded, and resources are withheld. Yet, when challenged, the architects of these policies claim their motives are purely practical, not racial. The harm is undeniable, but the intent is veiled, leaving no fingerprints to trace back to those in power.

Subpart 3. The Emotional Weight of “Proving It”

For those on the receiving end of this hidden racism, the burden of proof is crushing. In a system that demands clear evidence of intent—racial slurs, explicit policies—subtle but systemic discrimination becomes nearly impossible to challenge. Black families are forced to navigate a world where their lived experiences are constantly dismissed. When they are excluded from neighborhoods, schools, or jobs, they are told it isn’t “really” racism. This gaslighting erodes trust, chips away at resilience, and leaves people questioning their own reality. It also isolates them, turning systemic oppression into a deeply personal struggle.

Subpart 4. The Northern Myth of Innocence

Plausible deniability allows the North to maintain a myth of innocence. Unlike the South, where segregation is overt and codified, Northern racism hides behind polite excuses and bureaucratic practices. This creates a veneer of moral superiority; even as Black families face systemic barriers at every turn. Take the idea of “Minnesota Nice,” for example. On the surface, it suggests warmth and friendliness, but in practice, it often masks avoidance and discomfort with hard truths. Black families who migrate to Minnesota during the Great Migration encounter subtle yet pervasive discrimination: housing refusals, job exclusions, and unequal schooling. None of it is openly racist, yet all of it serves the same purpose—keeping communities segregated and opportunities unequal.

Subpart 5. Turning Towards Accountability

Challenging plausible deniability begins with exposing it for what it is—a deliberate strategy to avoid accountability. By naming the hidden intentions behind policies like redlining, biased hiring, and unequal education, we can start dismantling the systems that rely on this insidious tool. This requires asking tough questions and refusing to accept surface-level answers. It means holding individuals and institutions accountable for the consequences of their actions, even when those consequences are cloaked in plausible denials. This work isn’t about blame—it’s about truth. By shedding light on the quiet harm caused by plausible deniability, we open the door to real change. Only through honest reckoning can we fulfill the promises of equity and opportunity that the North claims to embody.

HISTORICAL FOUNDATIONS OF HEALTHCARE INEQUITY IN MINNESOTA

Subpart 1. Legacy of Racial Exclusion in Medical Systems

From the early 20th century, healthcare in Minnesota systematically excluded Black and Indigenous communities. Public hospitals often refused service to BIPOC individuals, relegating them to poorly funded facilities or none at all. This inequity fostered mistrust in the healthcare system, a legacy still seen today.

Example: The Minneapolis General Hospital (now Hennepin County Medical Center) historically served as the primary healthcare provider for marginalized communities, but with far fewer resources than facilities serving predominantly white populations. This disparity set a precedent for inadequate care.

Subpart 2. Eugenics and Public Health

Minnesota’s eugenics policies in the early 1900s targeted Indigenous women, Black women, and women with disabilities for forced sterilization. These actions were framed as public health measures, providing a veneer of plausible deniability to what was systemic violence.

Legacy: The memory of these atrocities contributes to ongoing mistrust in reproductive healthcare, particularly among Indigenous and Black women. Modern disparities in sterilization consent and access to family planning services echo this history.

CURRENT GAPS AND DISPARITIES IN HEALTHCARE

Subpart 3. Maternal and Infant Mortality

Maternal mortality among Black and Indigenous women in Minnesota is disproportionately high, often attributed to implicit bias in medical settings, lack of access to prenatal care, and systemic stressors like racism.

Example: A 2021 study revealed that Indigenous women in rural Minnesota were more likely to experience complications during childbirth due to delayed emergency care, often justified as a “capacity issue.”
Infant Mortality: Black infants face mortality rates nearly twice as high as white infants due to disparities in healthcare access and quality.

Subpart 4. Chronic Disease Management

Conditions like diabetes, hypertension, and heart disease are more prevalent and less effectively managed in BIPOC communities. Factors include lower access to specialists, implicit bias in treatment, and socioeconomic barriers.

Example: Many Native American communities in Minnesota suffer from disproportionately high rates of diabetes due to historical trauma and food deserts on reservations. Patients frequently report dismissive attitudes from healthcare providers when seeking treatment.

Subpart 5. Mental Health Disparities

BIPOC individuals in Minnesota are less likely to receive mental health care. When they do, they often encounter misdiagnoses or culturally incompetent providers.

Example: African American patients are often overdiagnosed with schizophrenia compared to white patients presenting with similar symptoms, highlighting implicit bias in psychiatric evaluations.
Plausible Deniability: Providers attribute these misdiagnoses to clinical judgment, masking systemic biases.

PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY IN HEALTHCARE PRACTICES

Subpart 6. Implicit Bias in Clinical Settings

Implicit bias shapes interactions between patients and providers, influencing diagnosis, treatment plans, and outcomes. Providers often dismiss complaints or underestimate symptoms from BIPOC patients.

Example: Research shows Black patients are less likely to be prescribed pain medication than white patients, even with identical symptoms. Providers may justify this disparity with concerns about opioid misuse, sidestepping the underlying bias.

Subpart 7. Discrimination in Access to Care

BIPOC patients using Medicaid often face longer wait times, limited provider networks, and substandard care. Providers cite “capacity issues” or “resource constraints” to justify these disparities, creating a veil of plausible deniability.

Subpart 8. Medical Debt and Financial Barriers

Healthcare costs disproportionately burden BIPOC Minnesotans. Aggressive medical debt collection practices further exacerbate these disparities.

Example: Hospitals frequently sue uninsured patients for unpaid bills, disproportionately affecting Black and Indigenous communities, despite charity care policies meant to assist low-income individuals.

LEGAL AND POLICY ISSUES IN HEALTHCARE

Subpart 9. Inadequate Protections Against Discrimination

While Minnesota law prohibits discrimination in healthcare, enforcement is weak. Victims often face complex reporting systems and inadequate follow-up.

Example: Complaints about discriminatory practices often go uninvestigated, with providers citing “miscommunication” as a defense.

Subpart 10. Lack of Representation in Leadership

Healthcare leadership in Minnesota lacks diversity, limiting the development of policies that prioritize equity. BIPOC voices are often excluded from decision-making processes.

Subpart 11. Gaps in Cultural Competency

Minnesota does not mandate cultural competency training for healthcare providers. This gap perpetuates misunderstandings and biases in patient care.

Example: Providers frequently misinterpret cultural practices and symptoms, leading to improper diagnoses and strained patient relationships.

STATISTICAL EVIDENCE OF RACIAL DISPARITIES

Subpart 12. Health Insurance Coverage

BIPOC Minnesotans are more likely to be uninsured or underinsured, limiting their access to consistent, quality care.

Subpart 13. Life Expectancy Gaps

In Minnesota, the life expectancy for Black residents is nearly six years shorter than for white residents. This disparity is a stark indicator of systemic inequities.

Subpart 14. COVID-19 Disparities

During the pandemic, Black and Indigenous Minnesotans faced higher infection and mortality rates. Overcrowded housing, frontline jobs, and unequal healthcare access were major contributors.

CASE STUDIES AND ANECDOTAL EVIDENCE

Subpart 15. Jamar Clark Incident

The case of Jamar Clark, a Black man shot by police in Minneapolis, underscores racial disparities in emergency care. Activists argued that Clark received inadequate treatment compared to white victims of similar injuries.

Subpart 16. Elder Care in Indigenous Communities

Indigenous elders often travel long distances for inadequate healthcare, highlighting disparities in elder care services.

Subpart 17. Black Maternal Health Advocacy

Numerous Black women in Minnesota report dismissive treatment during labor and postpartum care, contributing to negative outcomes and reinforcing mistrust.

POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS AND ADVOCACY

-Redacted because it’s nonsense-

Declaration and Decree

When time permits, I will compile a detailed list of specific issues and strategies for resolving them, purely for the sake of clarity. However, those involved in the matter are already fully aware of the issues and the means to resolve them. None of this is accidental, incidental, or paradoxical—it is deliberate.

The central problem is not a lack of understanding; it is the belief that one can continue engaging in criminally abusive behavior within their employment without consequence. That assumption is misguided. Historically, by the time I grow weary enough to meticulously dissect lies masquerading as truth, line by line, God has already mobilized an angelic task force, stirring the winds of change to dismantle and abolish the injustice.

Throughout my life, God has used me as both a pioneer and a closer—the first to enter a troubled situation and the last to leave before judgment is rendered. When justice refuses my reasonable pleas and fails to self-correct according to the truth I’ve spoken, the scales inevitably tip. It is not my will but divine timing. If an issue remains uncorrected, it is only because God is still collecting humanity’s cries, ensuring that when His judgment arrives, not only will the problems be addressed, but a New Foundation will be laid.

I could provide countless examples to illustrate this pattern, but that is not the purpose here.

To the Soulaani Victims:

If you have suffered harm, discrimination, or abuse, submit your firsthand, written complaints. Let your voice be recorded and your truth documented.

To the Offenders:

If you know you are guilty of bias, retaliation, or leveraging racial or economic privilege in the course of your employment, do not attempt to evade accountability. Running or hiding will only ensure that you are chosen as the example of divine justice. Instead, repent—change your ways—and atone. Reach out to your victims, acknowledge your wrongs, and make amends.

If it is too late to repair the harm you caused, then build yourself an ARK—an Act of Random Kindness. Not for your company or institution, but for the person you wronged. Do it personally.

If you are reading this, consider it your warning: Deboard the plane. There is turbulence ahead. Get off the ship. Collision is unavoidable. Tomorrow’s price is not today’s price.

Understand this: I will not act in retaliation. This is not about me. God is coming—not because of what may happen to me now, but because of what has already been done to me. Those who have inflicted harm did so knowingly and intentionally. There will be judgment.

Contrary to popular belief, the only judgment that awaits in the afterlife is our own eternity.

Do not take comfort in false relief. I have been to the edge, in a near-death experience, hovering above the earth as EMTs fought to save my body. From that vantage point, I saw humanity stripped bare, with all its flaws and virtues revealed for what they are.

When your time comes, you too will see everything with pure sight. You will watch your life unfold in every interaction, every choice, and every ripple of consequence you created. You will not only see the people you knew but also those you overlooked—the countless lives you affected without even realizing it, like raindrops creating endless ripples across still waters.

And in that clarity, you will feel the weight of your missteps, the harm you caused, and the pain that spread outward from your actions. You will watch as those ripples collide with others, perpetuating cycles of harm—cycles that began with you. The sight will bring no solace, only a profound disgust with yourself, knowing there is no way to return to earth and undo the damage. This is the eternal reality of losing rewards: witnessing the consequences of your actions and their echoes for eternity.

Because life and death, in their essence, are you versus you.

Unless you are too blinded by pride to choose your final destination, everyone is returning to the same heaven—the same light—from which we all came. It matters not whether others believe this truth; I know it, and I will see them when we meet again in heaven.

When that time comes, I will remain as I am now—a voice of certainty, a "know-it-all" if you will. Not because I claim perfection, but because right is right, and wrong is wrong. And I know I said it right, when I said it or I would have refrained from saying anything at all. These truths endure, unshaken by doubt or disbelief.

Here and now, God works through people. This is your chance, while alive, to secure the reward of a more beautiful final project, not in the end, but for the end. My complaint has been lodged in the Highest Courts of Heaven—the Most High, where divine authority and holy witnesses preside. This exposé serves as documentation for the Court of Public Opinion.

For now, I am done. Ase

There is one solution: enforce the policy, regulation and law equitably. Fire dissenters and carry on. #StopPlaying

HISTORICAL FOUNDATIONS OF HOUSING INEQUITY IN MINNESOTA

Racial Covenants: As documented in the Jim Crow of the North documentary and research by the Mapping Prejudice project, racial covenants were used extensively in Minnesota to bar nonwhite families from purchasing homes in certain neighborhoods. While these covenants were declared unenforceable by the Supreme Court in Shelley v. Kraemer (1948), their legacy persists in the stark racial disparities in housing and wealth.

De facto Segregation: The patterns of housing segregation, entrenched through racially restrictive covenants, were reinforced by redlining practices and discriminatory lending policies that excluded Black families from homeownership opportunities. Section 8 housing has often concentrated minority tenants in areas with limited resources, perpetuating segregation.

Subpart 18. Racial Covenants and Redlining

o As detailed by the Mapping Prejudice Project, racially restrictive covenants in deeds prohibited Black families and other minorities from purchasing homes in many Minnesota neighborhoods.

o Legacy: These covenants, though unenforceable after Shelley v. Kraemer (1948), created a structural barrier to wealth accumulation and neighborhood integration. The effects are still visible in the stark racial disparities in homeownership and concentrated poverty.

Subpart 19. Federal Housing Policies

o The 1930s Home Owners' Loan Corporation (HOLC) maps labeled neighborhoods with minority residents as "hazardous," cutting them off from federal loan guarantees. In Minnesota, this systematically excluded Black families from suburban growth fueled by postwar FHA loans.

Subpart 20. De Facto Segregation Today

Despite the Fair Housing Act of 1968, zoning laws and "neighborhood preservation" rhetoric continue to maintain racial segregation. Wealthier suburbs use restrictive zoning to exclude affordable housing and Section 8 voucher holders.

SUBPART 21

HOUSING COVENANTS ARE NOT A THING OF THE PAST. IT’S THE ROOT OF THE CURRENT RENTAL.

When Jim Crow of the North was released, I was living through my own chapter of systemic injustice, targeted by a racial covenant in West Saint Paul, Minnesota. This covenant was solely about race "because its was about me specifically"; but it was deeply intertwined with actions by the Minnesota Department of Human Services (DHS) under former commissioners Lucinda Jesson and Emily Piper Johnson. For years, I formally reported in writing the fraud perpetrated within DHS—a fraud that actively blocked my access to critical medical treatment as my body deteriorated.

This was not a bureaucratic oversight. It was a deliberate act. I was not on a waitlist; I had already overcome that hurdle. I was opened under the Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) Waiver and certified in Consumer Directed Support Services, offering internal education to explain the external processes impacting me directly. Yet, despite my certification and status, systemic fraud persisted, depriving me of healthcare services totaling nearly $777,000. Over the years, this denial kept me physically disabled, not by medical necessity but by intentional design—a profit-driven scheme that exploited disabled Minnesotans.

Between 2010 and 2014, I died five times due to the lack of medical care. Each time, I sent detailed reports of what was happening. After coming forward with these facts, I was no longer just another case; I became a direct threat to the system. The abuse intensified as a means of cover-up because my story, if exposed, could unravel the entire scheme. Multiply my experience by an estimated 15,000 disabled Minnesotans subjected to similar abuse, and it becomes clear: this is a monstrous machine fueled by deliberate actions, shielded by those in power, and perpetuated at a staggering profit.

This wasn’t simply mismanagement—it mirrored the atrocities of Hitler’s Holocaust, only this time the target wasn’t Jews; it was disabled individuals. DHS systematically rerouted disabled Minnesotans to institutions where they endured maltreatment and suffering for financial gain.

Faced with this, I decided to leave Minnesota in pursuit of health and safety. That’s when DHS and its collaborators employed the CDA (Community Development Agency) to revoke my housing voucher, preventing me from leaving the state with the documents that could expose their crimes. Federal crimes were committed in the process, including the outright theft of my Section 8 voucher, leaving me without resources or recourse.

They treated me like Dred Scott—refusing to acknowledge my humanity, disregarding laws that should have protected me, and conspiring to erase my existence from their records. The CDA and collaborating agencies, including the Southern Nevada Regional Housing Authority (SNRHA), committed further crimes to cover their involvement.

Despite these efforts, I left Minnesota anyway, carrying nothing but the clothes on my back. I received spinal surgery and, for the first time since my forced disability, returned to the workforce. This alone proved what Minnesota had been covering since 2003: I was sick and disabled because the state forced it, not because of my medical diagnoses. The crimes they committed to maintain this illusion speak volumes about their intent.

However, the abuse didn’t end there. Forced to flee back to Minnesota due to sex traffickers, I endured worse conditions, including 1,775 days of illegal homelessness where I was repeatedly beaten, sexually assaulted, and exposed to murders and other horrors. I eventually had to stop the medical treatment I had secured while homeless due to these ongoing dangers.

This rental, which now connects to real estate cases against Don Klyberg, Anthony Anderson, and Rick Newman, was never a choice—it was the result of years of systemic abuse, criminal acts, and deliberate obstruction of justice by state and federal agencies.

The housing covenant in West Saint Paul was part of a larger strategy to hide Dakota County's actions connected to a class action lawsuit. I wasn’t mentioned in the media because the goal was for me to not exist. And, as if to underscore the systemic erasure, a blonde-haired, blue-eyed woman was chosen for the cover story—a deliberate slight targeting a Black woman with more experience and insight than those who sought to silence her.

There must be justice. This is not just my story; it is a call to action for the countless lives impacted by these injustices. The crimes committed must be exposed, and accountability must follow. See the business of states.

CASE LAW AND LEGAL PRECEDENTS HIGHLIGHTING DISCRIMINATION

Subpart 22. Minneapolis Public Housing Authority v. Greene (1998):

This case highlighted how public housing policies disproportionately affected African-American families in Minnesota. Eviction and housing denial policies often relied on minor infractions or vague "threats to safety," disproportionately impacting Black tenants and enabling racial disparities under the guise of neutral rules.

Data: African-American tenants alleged systemic bias in eviction practices that disproportionately targeted minority households under vague "safety concerns." Courts ruled that such practices, though neutral on paper, perpetuated racial injustice.

Minnesota courts have addressed cases where zoning laws, housing inspections, or other seemingly race-neutral policies have led to discriminatory outcomes. These cases often hinge on proving intent or showing systemic disparate impacts.

DISPARATE IMPACT AND FAIR HOUSING ACT CASES:

Subpart 23. Gallagher v. Magner (2012):

A key case out of St. Paul, this involved landlords suing the city over strict housing code enforcement, which they argued led to the displacement of minority tenants in Section 8 housing. The landlords claimed the enforcement violated the Fair Housing Act due to its disparate impact on African Americans. The case reached the Supreme Court but was settled before a ruling, leaving the legal questions about "disparate impact" unanswered.

Data: Landlords in St. Paul argued that aggressive city code enforcement disproportionately affected minority tenants and violated the Fair Housing Act under the "disparate impact" doctrine. While the case was settled, it highlighted the tension between housing quality and discrimination.

Fair Housing Act Cases on Disparate Impact: Minnesota courts have seen numerous cases where policies such as zoning laws or housing inspections disproportionately affect communities of color. Establishing intent, however, remains a legal hurdle, enabling plausible deniability.

STATISTICAL EVIDENCE OF RACIAL INEQUITIES

Subpart 24. Homeownership Disparities

o Black homeownership in Minneapolis is just 20%, compared to 76% for white residents (2020 Census). This gap is among the worst in the U.S.

Subpart 25. Concentration of Section 8 Tenants

o A 2018 Housing Justice Center study revealed that most Section 8 vouchers in Minnesota are used in racially segregated, under-resourced neighborhoods, reinforcing cycles of poverty.

Subpart 26. Eviction Data

o Research from the Minnesota Housing Partnership shows that Black renters are evicted at rates significantly higher than white renters. This trend is exacerbated by retaliatory evictions, often shielded by vague lease terms.

PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY IN HOUSING POLICIES

Subpart 27. Zoning and Land Use Laws

o Suburban communities, such as Edina and Eden Prairie, maintain exclusionary zoning ordinances that limit affordable housing. The justification often centers on preserving property values or "neighborhood character," subtly perpetuating racial segregation.

Subpart 28. Landlord Discrimination

o Landlords commonly reject Section 8 vouchers, citing "administrative burdens" or inspection requirements. While source-of-income discrimination is not explicitly illegal in Minnesota, it disproportionately affects Black families reliant on vouchers.

Subpart 29. Neglect and Retaliation

o Tenants report that landlords neglect maintenance and repairs in Section 8 properties to force them out, avoiding the administrative oversight tied to the program. These practices create a veneer of compliance while perpetuating displacement.

ANECDOTAL AND CASE EXAMPLES

Subpart 30. Cedar-Riverside Section 8 Housing

o Somali families in the Cedar-Riverside neighborhood have faced landlord neglect, pest infestations, and maintenance refusals. Complaints to city officials are often dismissed as "cultural misunderstandings," further isolating tenants.

Subpart 31. Gentrification in North Minneapolis

o Redevelopment projects in historically Black neighborhoods displace Section 8 tenants as landlords sell properties to developers. The North Side's transformation highlights how gentrification disproportionately impacts minority renters.

Note: Don Klyberg’s Chief Location for Rental Real Estate Prior To Rental Licenses Revocation

Subpart 32. Tenant Harassment and Surveillance

Cases in Minneapolis reveal landlords using surveillance cameras and lease violations as tools to intimidate Section 8 tenants, particularly single mothers, under the guise of "ensuring safety."

EXPOSING INTIMIDATION AND CRIMINAL NARRATIVES

Note: Don Klyberg’s employee, Rick Newmann, has habitually misused surveillance as a tactic of intimidation and sought to exploit me—potentially through my children, had there been any in the residence. These individuals, along with their methods DO NOT CHANGE because the so-called “disparities” of poor Black outcomes they present to the public are not reflective of the victims' realities. Instead, they are curated circumstances and narratives perpetuated by chronic criminal behavior. In most cases, those responsible are white. I am not just exposing Don Klyberg and company. I am exposing the way things have been done in Minnesota so that Soulaan do not have to grapple as much with the strategical weapon of Subpart 3. The Emotional Weight of Proving It—on case by case basis when they’re victims of misconduct. I am demonstrating these are weapons, deployed again and again, as weapons are. Do less proving of injuries and more proving of criminal activity until this so-called Minnesota Paradox crumbles. It’s only working because it’s hiding its hand and silencing the victims narrative.

I should not be here—in this state, at this location, in this rental, or in this condition—having to call this out. I moved with the intention of enjoying a healthy new life beyond Minnesota as far back as 2017. Yet, through their criminal actions and systemic corruption, they forced me to stay, turning a blind eye to justice.

So, if I have to be here:

1. NO. I AM NOT EASY TARGET

I am not going to be an individual that does not receive justice when I am a victim of crime. All parties will be documented, for the change that is to come because of what’s been done to me and refusal to make me whole; irrespective of what happens with me personally.

2. NO. I AM NOT THE DEBTOR OF CRIMINAL ACTIVITY WHICH I AM VICTIM TO

Breaking the Chains of Systemic Theft and Oppression

I refuse to carry the burden of criminal actions to my own detriment and demise. The thefts, the methods used, and the stolen wealth will be documented for the change that must come—not just for my sake but for all those whose wealth has been systematically stolen and denied.

Since December 1, 2023, Don Klyberg Real Estate has constructively stolen over $18,700 from me—an amount that exceeds the average wealth in Soulaani Minnesota homes. This theft was achieved through criminal acts violating state and federal laws.

If systems continue to deflect accountability by printing so-called wealth disparities as a basis for more funding and the continued communal disparaging of black reputation as a learned behavior within the western world, while printing nothing about where the wealth has gone to—when they know why the money is missing, I will expose where that wealth truly went myself. I have documented everything in undeniable terms—photos, videos, and retail costs sourced directly from retailers.

This is not just for me but for all Soulaani households currently victimized by systematic robbery, corruption, and crimes. The truth is, we don’t need more funding for welfare or community programs; those in power are stealing the resources meant for us. Like the exploitative Indian Companies of old, they commit crimes in documentation and processes, which go uncorrected due to the demographics of the victims they target.

The solution is not more programs but law and order. Policies, regulations, and laws already exist to ensure equity; the problem lies in their selective enforcement. So, there’s your poverty and therefore your solution. If people don’t want to resolve poverty, fine, but don’t keep lying about it. Show yourself stealing and supporting thieves. Stop using innocent, suffering, Soulaani as shields for your wicked activities. If those in positions of power refuse to execute their obligations equitably: FIRE THEM. They can absolutely be replaced by the millions of victims whom are also talented individuals able to execute those positions, committed to excellence and equality for all having the experience of having been victim of the opposite themselves. (Psalms 94)

The Roots of the Problem

Question statistics on Soulaani workforce and critically identify where untapped Soulaani workforce is. Because Soulaani know where the workers are. The systemic disenfranchisement of Soulaani workers is intentional. Soulaani people are systematically pushed into death zones within the free world, whilst monitored like parolee’s in absence of crimes, through systematically imposed poverty—systemically; until they can be routed to prison cages, where they are exploited for employment under slave wages, while denied civil rights and given a lifelong poor reputation for their contributions even after time has been served—if they live to see it. This is not just history repeating itself—it is a perpetuation of slavery under a different process. (Ecclesiastics 1:9)

Let’s get over it and be great again. The Towering figure of the republic, 16^th president of the United States of America, Abraham Lincoln would have it that way. Emancipation was won 157 years ago. Why are we still operating in yokes of slavery?

Emancipation was not to liberate Soulaani from plantations—these captives had been militantly, nationally, liberating themselves since 1857. Emancipation was about law. It happened to ensure equitable inclusion in protection under the protection of law as citizens of the United States of America.

The Civil Rights Movement of the 20th century was not about ending racism. Civil Rights movement was about law. Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Negotiated policy in Washington D.C., not just delivered sermons on inspirational dreams. It was about enforcing laws for equal pay and protecting the right to pursue happiness.

The false narrative of Soulaani dependence was crafted when white Americans burned down thriving, prosperous, segregated Soulaani businesses and neighborhoods—come of this nation’s most recognizable landmarks today were thriving black communities, forcing us into a white workforce where we mistreated by the children of settler’s who refused to economically compete with the historical innovation, ingenuity and nurturing model of family first throughout the population, held in tact by Soulaani women—previously forced to give that nurture to white children, and white families, rather than her own; incessantly mocked and attacked with false narratives juxtaposition to her true wealth and contribution ever since the close of the civil rights era, so that she will not ever contribute to the Soulaani financial independence, alongside white Americans, not captive of them, which was nearly set in stone—for her and her children they established the Department of Human Service. In my lifetime, there service has been “captivity” and “destruction” until death do, we part. But I want my freedom to go with God while I’m still alive to enjoy all the glory, grace and beauty, that God prepared for me in this life long before the world ever knew me. I know what I have going on and I don’t need anyone to tell me about me—God and I, are aware of me. I don’t need anyone else’s plan for me, I’m free to pursue God’s plan for me. I’m not out of control. I have never been out of control. To the contrary, I have been under God’s control the whole time and I will remain as such, everlasting. (Matthew 6:24, Joshua 24:15)

My case(s) also is about Law. (John 10:10) Enforcement of Law to get the monsters off of me, away from me and away from MY wealth. (Matthew 7:6) Not a script crafted by and oppressed upon me by external forces (Matthew 16:23) but reality (Deuteronomy 1:11), self-determined, freely, by inalienable birthright (Crown Met Wealth III) to establish my God’s vision of me: Destiny. Stop systematically, attempting to cancel my destiny. (Jeremiah 29:11, Mark 10:9)

A New Generation's Call

The new generation has a clear message: this is not a race issue. The race issue is not now and has never been, a black issue. Black people have been on earth longer than any other race and have never had an issue sharing space, wealth, and opportunity with others. We know that world leaders are aware of this truth.

We know that the United States has harbored animosity toward Black women and their children since the king of their country, Great Britian, King George III married a Black queen named Charolette and fathered nine biracial Royal heirs. This lineage triggered confused individuals to forsake their country and pursue "white land," not by creating one, but by stealing one. We were here too as we were in Great Britian—read the declaration of Independence. lol. That’s the ridiculousness of this race issue but I’m not going to go all the way back in history to the Kingdom of Alba (Scotland and Ireland) to ask the question: Why do you hate me when are me, you come from me, why was this not enough and if not enough—why must we continue to go about it this way which has never and can never prosper? Truthfully, are you not as tired of depriving yourselves as black people are tired of being deprived? Are total, harmonious, splendor and peace such awful fates?

Despite this animosity and acts of cruelty, Black people—both Obi (Original Black Inhabitants) and African Americans—we are all now Soulaani, contributed significantly. They helped the settlers form the United States during the Revolution and later build it until the Civil War. (After all, people aren’t promised "40 acres and a mule" for military service unless that service is indispensable to winning.) Until Supreme Court Chief Justice Roger B. Taney decided to put an end to that as well “with theft and cruelty” it always comes back to these things. In both cases, Black people made these contributions for the same promise: to be left alone as equal partners in the United States not captives of it—a promise that has not yet been fulfilled.

Black forefathers could demanded wealth for participation but they did not; and for a great reason. As children of the Most High God we comprehend that wealth is already within us. We carry this lineage passed down father to son. They settled for a plot of land and a mule to clear the plot. (peace) who they are and what they do in their own space was not the nations business.

If one understands U.S. history than one can understand that poverty is a weapon set in place for the sole purpose of destroy autonomy. Why do you think knowledge is power? Answer, first you get the power and then you get the money. Public programs require an excessive amount of knowledge about participants. That knowledge, drives power. That power is used to steal the money. Case in point.

Those of us who are intelligent, literally do not care about racial rhetoric. Race is a white issue. What we demand is to be left alone by racists and racism.

Lying, stealing, and killing cannot continue. If we all have what it takes to compete, let that competition be fair. The new generation will not allow the old ways of oppression to stand.

The Prophecy

I prophesy that equity will prevail, or the land will fall. The great empires of Babylon (modern day Iraq) and Persia (Modern day Iran) serve as reminders that no civilization is immune to collapse. The scientific cycles of empire predict that at 250 years, societies face critical turning points. As the United States approaches its 250th birthday on July 4, 2026, the choice is clear: embrace equity or face the consequences of systemic injustice. The youngest among us are asking for a united nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Let us keep it simple: enforce the law, ensure equity, and stop the madness. Because change is inevitable.

3. NO. I WILL NOT BE TYPECAST THE BLACK FOOL

· Do not, anymore, name me, frame me, present me or dismiss me as who you want me to be. I am that I am and its my freedom to be.

· Do not, berate me, when I raise a valid issue in need of resolve by insinuating: I am confused, incompetent, dishonest, criminal, uppity, aggressive, threatening—do not give me a false narrative to prove incorrect— by God it will be proven as such.

· Do not, attempt to ensnare me, in racial debate—intent on delaying resolve or fancy language meant to dismiss criminality.

· I am American. So, I show up as such. I am not concerned in the least about the misunderstanding of my character, by people intent on Misunderstanding my character. I Do Not Care about societies boxes or trivial games. Nothing society can do can ever make me care about the wicked ways of the world or change my heart. All I get is annoyed by the wasting of my time and the animalistic intrusion of my boundaries.

· I have a right to privacy even if I cannot afford an attorney to protect it because a system has been beating on my body for three+ decades so that I cannot work to afford that attorney. I am still going to expect and pursue a right to privacy and I understand clearly that my privacy is being eroded by poverty. Poverty is being forced through systematic criminality. Once impoverished innumerable individuals start thrusting power over who I am on paper and how I show up physically while silencing the realities of both visions. No, thank you. We need to discuss the money. The money stolen to get me here. The money stolen why am here. The money that false reports help block me from receiving. People are stealing from me and by me, I mean black people. See the use of I, in African culture.

Please forgive me for my sermon. I suffer from Legal Abuse Syndrome (LAS) officially recorded as PTSD. It’s medical, so. As you can see it doesn’t stop me from knowing what’s up and sermon doesn’t justify a denial. Like I said: Don’t. Please.

GAPS IN POLICY AND ENFORCEMENT

Subpart 31. Lack of Source of Income Protections

Minnesota lacks statewide protections against discrimination based on income sources. This allows landlords to openly reject Section 8 tenants, disproportionately affecting minority families.

Subpart 32. Weak Tenant Protections

Retaliatory eviction laws are underenforced, leaving tenants vulnerable to landlord abuse. Minor lease violations are often used as pretexts for eviction, a tactic disproportionately applied to minority renters.

Subpart 33. Disparate Code Enforcement

Housing code enforcement disproportionately targets properties with minority tenants, leading to eviction or displacement rather than remediation.

POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS AND ADVOCACY

1. Strengthen Source of Income Laws: Advocate for statewide legislation prohibiting discrimination against Section 8 voucher holders, as implemented in other states like California and New York.

2. Increase Tenant Protections: Expand protections against retaliatory eviction and enforce stricter penalties for landlord neglect, particularly in properties with vulnerable tenants.

3. Address Zoning Inequities: Separate federal subsidized housing from the same organization responsible for public transportation and ensure that MN Dot is not out-zoning opportunities with racial and economic bias.

4. Community-Led Housing Initiatives: Support programs that enable tenant ownership or cooperative housing models, particularly for populations historically affected by and at risk of gentrification i.e African Americans.

I believe my point has been made. The damage caused by liberal, progressive racism is profound, and its impact extends beyond the structural—it is deeply personal and it’s hurting my feelings. Not only being the target of it, but the second violation of the denial of it. Ah, we’re all only human. Only so much is tolerable. It’s time to shift our focus from scapegoating political opponents, their supporters, or law enforcement to define racism, and instead, confront the harm perpetuated by ongoing, present-day actions. We must abandon the dishonest habit of cherry-picking distant historical events to obscure the direct consequences of current policies and practices.

Let us also cease exploiting Soulaani people as convenient tools to justify behaviors or maintain illusions of privilege, and stop using discussions of racism as a shield for the criminal systems and practices that uphold the status quo. Disparity cannot coexist with genuine lawfulness. Where policies, regulations, or laws result in disparities, criminal intent is at play. If regulators fail to address this, their inaction signals further complicity, and if the judicial system refuses to act, the rot runs deeper still—and we’ve been here before family.

Excuses no longer hold weight in this conversation. Excuses are an outdated concept. It requires accountability, integrity, and the courage to dismantle the harmful behaviors that perpetuate inequity. All I do is work on myself. I am not afraid of this conversation. I have the courage to make internal corrections and to address external correction where needed. 99% of things I let happen without resistance. The 1% where I say no, is no.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Alliance for Housing Justice. (2018, August 8). Understanding Disparate Impact in Housing. Retrieved from Alliance for Housing Justice: https://www.allianceforhousingjustice.org/post/understanding-disparate-impact

Alliance for Housing Justice. (n.d.). Understanding Disparate Impact. Retrieved from Alliance for Housing Justice: https://www.allianceforhousingjustice.org/understanding-di

Block, B. (2022, Feburary 16). How biased algorithms create barriers to housing. Retrieved from ACLU Washington: https://www.aclu-wa.org/story/how-biased-algorithms-create-barriers-housing

Brad Blower, M. C. (2022, October). Faulty Foundations: Mystery-Shopper Testing In Home Appraisals Exposes Racial Bias Undermining Black Wealth. Retrieved from National Community Reinvestment Coalitions: https://ncrc.org/faulty-foundations-mystery-shopper-testing-in-home-appraisals-exposes-racial-bias-undermining-black-wealth/

Dakota County Community Development Agency. (n.d.). Fair Housing. Retrieved from Dakota County Community Development Agency: https://www.dakotacda.org/fair-housing/

Hoffman, F. P. (2018, July 17). Disparate Impact Rule Should be Upheld. Retrieved from National Housing Trust: https://nationalhousingtrust.org/news/disparate-impact-rule-should-be-upheld

Justia Law. (n.d.). MINNEAPOLIS PUBLIC HOUSING v. Greene. Retrieved from https://law.justia.com/cases/minnesota/court-of-appeals/1990/c9-90-1021.html

Minneapolis Public Housing Agency. (2016, october). Analysis of Potential Inspections Coordination between the Minneapolis Public Housing Authority Minneapolis. Retrieved from Minneapolis PHA: https://mphaonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Analysis-of-Potential-Inspections-Coordination-report.pdf

Minnesota, S. o. (n.d.). Minnesota Housing. Retrieved from Fair Housing: https://www.mnhousing.gov/fair-housing.html

NAACP. (2012, Feburary 1). Economic Justice Magner v. Gallagher. Retrieved from Legal Defense Fund: https://www.naacpldf.org/case-issue/magner-v-gallagher/

The White House. (2021, June 17). Exclusionary Zoning: Its Effect on Racial Discrimination in the Housing Market. Retrieved from The White House: https://www.whitehouse.gov/cea/written-materials/2021/06/17/exclusionary-zoning-its-effect-on-racial-discrimination-in-the-housing-market/

TOA. (n.d.). Talking About Magner v. Gallagher. Retrieved from The Opportunity Agenda: https://opportunityagenda.org/messaging_reports/talking-about-magner-v-gallagher/

VLEX. (n.d.). Minneapolis Public Housing Authority v. Greene, C9-90-1021. Retrieved from vLex.com: https://case-law.vlex.com/vid/minneapolis-public-housing-authority-890029849

What Is Exclusionary Zoning? (n.d.). Retrieved from Planetizen : https://www.planetizen.com/definition/exclusionary-zoning

WALLS OF SILENCE

Search This Blog

ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE WEBSITE