WALLS OF
SILENCE
SECTION 7 TITLE 7.7 RICK NEWMANN STRIKES AGAIN THREE MONTHS OF UNSOLICITED TEXT MESSGAGES
Coercion, Sexual Harassment, Grooming & Cyberbullying
Rick Newmann’s sexual harassment escalated into sexual advances and aggression in
early April; when he made an unwelcome advance in the
rental office during the first week of the month, I had decided to cut off all
communication with him except to respond to official written notices. Yet, his
behavior persisted, creating an unbearable, hostile and an Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED) environment in the property I rented as
my home.
Subpart
1
Medical
Impact Of Surveillance
Rick’s
relentless surveillance, fixated on peering through my windows and blocking my
view, monitoring my phone conversations by turning off his noise harassment
machines and standing under my window just while I have private conversations
over the phone or virtual therapy, then turning back on noise harassment
machines so that I cannot have any peace or relaxation which does not involve
him, such as: turning on but not using loud tools, vehicle, tractors so that I
cannot hear television or music unless its on full volume as an attention
seeking behaviors made the already unlivable conditions of the apartment even
more suffocating—it has made my Stage 2 Hypertension, Chiari Malformation
related muscle spasms, muscle aches, Chiari Malformation headaches, as well as
executive function and short term memory harder to manage initially but after
months completely debilitated me and eliminated my ability to maintain
schedules, structure and effective functioning in Activities of Daily Life
(ADLs).
On April
16, 2024 I had another sleepless night really feeling the heavy burden of RickNewmann smothering me and refusing to accept my demands to stop harassing me. I
was holding back tears thinking about waking up the next days just to be
secluded in this rural area harassed by the property manager. I decided to do
the unthinkable which is close all the windows and curtains. Without natural
light, the atmosphere inside became deeply depressing, exacerbated by filthy
carpets full of dander, holes in the walls, and pervasive odors from the
standing unsanitary animal waste.
Subpart
2
Medical
Implications Of Closing Off Windows In Unsanitary Living Conditions: Animal
Cruelty
The
stench wasn’t confined to any one area—it permeated my entire unit. The neglect
extended to the entire property, where animal bodily waste sat for weeks in
common areas, seeping through walls, floors, and vents into neighboring spaces;
specifically my unit because the main offender and laundry room (which the
animals enjoy and litter boxes are often dumped into the laundry trash bin
right outside the offenders apartment(s) door rather than the outside dumpsters
then left for weeks at a time).
The
property’s neglect and the scale of animal cruelty on the premises were
appalling. The tenant responsible for the animals lived in unsanitary
conditions that raised serious concerns for their mental health and
well-being.
Update: according
to November 28, 2024 Incident is one of the victims enduring sexual contact
from Newmann. In any urban jurisdiction like Minneapolis or Saint Paul,
these circumstances would likely have warranted intervention by authorities,
including the seizure of the animals and psychological evaluation of the owner.
However, as a tenant, I had no legal authority to intervene; I am not social
worker or judge. I was left to endure these conditions as I attempted to
continue managing my own overwhelming challenges i.e. "mind my own
business" and survive until I can relocate; by using fans, opened windows;
natural light and odor control.
Subpart
3
Medical
Implications Of Closing Off Curtains During Pest Infestation: Roaches And Fleas
Compounding
the situation, the property became infested with pests—a situation that had
been growing unchecked for three months by April. The infestation originated
from Rick Newmann’s own apartment, which doubles as the rental
office—allegedly. He had been moving furniture and items back and forth from
his unit, the garage, and dumpsters. Instead of addressing the issue, Rick's
priority was maintaining an illusion of responsibility to preserve his
"male privilege" and "alpha" image. His refusal toacknowledge his responsibility or engage an exterminator allowed the
infestation to worsen, spreading pests—particularly cockroaches—into other
units in the building, reflecting a broader pattern: Rick hides his
failures, blames others, and lashes out with aggression when his inadequacies are exposed. Knowing this both through observation and being the target of
these outburst influenced the severity of the hostile living environment and is
an intimidation factor that influences silence when a victim wants to scream
out—you know he’s just going to attack you and worse and escalate whatever he’s
was doing as he behaves like an untouchable tyrant, so its easier
just to tolerate him with silence and distances as a form of resistance wherever
possible.
Despite
treating his own unit, the cockroaches—particularly cockroaches—have
migrated to other apartments. Meanwhile, nothing else in the building is
maintained. This negligence and unsanitary conditions, including weeks-old
animal waste, created an ideal breeding ground for pests. Despite treating his
own unit, Rick’s negligence in maintaining the rest of the building facilitated
the infestation. My efforts to mitigate the issue, such as keeping my curtains
open and lights on to deter pests, were thwarted by Rick’s incessant
surveillance.
Subpart
4 An Escalation
Cyber
Bullying On My Phone Once The Windows And Curtains Were Closed
To
preserve some semblance of privacy, I eventually closed the curtains, but Rick
retaliated by staging prolonged, disruptive gatherings outside my
window. The next day, he retaliated to me “closing my own windows and
curtains” by entertaining the neighborhood right outside my window—longer,
louder, and closer than usual. When his “audience” finally left, he sent a text
message to my private line, saying, “Hey, haven’t seen or heard from you.” This
message wasn’t friendly or professional— This message was neither friendly nor
professional but a coercive attempt to assert control and intimidate me into
reopening the curtains. There was no professional or personal justification for
him to contact me in this manner, making it a clear abuse of his role as property
manager. We’ve never had a relationship or friendship, an exchange and nothing
in our history would justify such personal contact as hey haven’t seen or heard
from you—especially when you know you have seen me in passing, have seen me
when I paid the rent, took out the trash—asked you to call an exterminator
again. The behavior was a new escalation, in the continuance of five
months of harassment.
Over the
next two months, Rick escalated his harassment by engaging in sexual
cyberbullying. The property manager and maintenance man sent unsolicited
and inappropriate text messages to my private number. These messages included
depersonalizing and coercive “romantic pet names,” indicative of grooming
behaviors intended to coerce me into a sexual relationship. By exploiting my
personal contact information—provided solely for legitimate rental
purposes—Rick violated my privacy and leveraged his position to intimidate and
dehumanize me in my own home.
This
calculated campaign of surveillance, harassment, and sexual cyberbullying
constituted a severe abuse of power. It created a hostile and unsafe livingenvironment, infringing on my legal right to privacy, dignity, and the quiet
enjoyment of my home. The scenario of a property manager sending unwanted
sexual text messages to coerce a tenant aligns with the definition of sexual
cyberbullying when framed within the elements outlined in the
referenced Appendix. Here's how property manager Rick Newmann of Don Klyberg’s
rental property behavior qualifies:
Subpart
5
Key Components
Of Sexual Cyberbullying
1.Use of Electronic
Media: Sexual cyberbullying is defined by actions that use
electronic communication, such as text messages or social media platforms, to
perpetrate sexually coercive or aggressive behavior. In this case, the property
manager's repeated and unwarranted sexual texts meet this criterion.
2.Sexual Aggression and Coercion: The
texts include sexually explicit content or language designed to intimidate,
manipulate, or harass the tenant. Coercion, especially tied to the
tenant's housing security, escalates this behavior from harassment to a clear
form of sexual aggression.
3.Power Dynamics: A critical factor in this
scenario is the inherent power imbalance between a property manager and a
tenant. Leveraging control over housing to exert pressure on someone is both a
legal and ethical violation. The sexual nature of the coercion amplifies the
harm and its classification as cyberbullying.
4.Intent and Consequence: Intent is
significant in defining sexual cyberbullying. Here, the unwanted texts aim
to manipulate the tenant into compliance, using fear of housing instability as
leverage. Consequences may include psychological distress, fear of eviction, or
financial insecurity, all of which align with the documented effects of sexual cyberbullying.
Legal And
Social Implications
Cyberbullying
Definitions in Law: The referenced study
highlights that definitions of cyberbullying often depend on jurisdiction and
specific actions. This behavior may fall under cyberstalking or electronic
harassment laws in many regions, particularly when repeated messages
aim to create a hostile or threatening environment.
Image-Based Sexual
Abuse Comparison: While not involving explicit
images, the coercive nature of these messages parallels image-based sexual
abuse, wherein the digital platform facilitates the perpetration of harm. Both
cases exploit digital communication to achieve dominance over the victim.
Furthermore, property manager Rick Newmann did link Facebook image links which
were never opened by the victim
Subpart
7
Additional
Factors
A. Demographic Vulnerabilities: The
tenant's potential lack of stable living conditions heightens their
vulnerability. The property manager exploits this instability, demonstrating
how social factors intertwine with digital abuse.
B. Risk and Protective
Factors:
1.Risk: The
tenant's dependency on housing creates an environment ripe for exploitation.
2.Protection: Legal
awareness and access to supportive networks (e.g., tenant advocacy groups or
legal aid) could mitigate this exploitation.
C. Prevention and Legal Action: Emphasizing
educational interventions and robust legal frameworks against sexual
cyberbullying is critical. Housing contexts, often overlooked, should be
integrated into broader discussions of cyberbullying prevention.
Conclusion: This
scenario exemplifies sexual cyberbullying, marked by electronic coercion, abuse
of power, and significant emotional and societal harm. The inclusion of such
cases in the novel's exploration of sexual cyberbullying underscores its
nuanced and pervasive nature. Addressing these behaviors demands a combination
of public awareness, strengthened legal responses, and targeted prevention
strategies.
Subpart
8
Policy
Rick
Newmann's actions, as described, constitute violations of several state and
federal laws that protect your rights as a tenant, an individual with a
disability, and a member of a protected class. Below is a breakdown of your
legal rights and the potential violations:
(A) Violation of Right to Privacy (Legal
Basis)
Minn.
Stat. § 504B.211 – Minnesota law prohibits a landlord or
property manager from entering a tenant's rental unit without reasonable notice
and legitimate purpose. Persistent surveillance, peering into windows, and
sending unsolicited personal messages constitute harassment and a breach of
your reasonable expectation of privacy.
Federal
Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. § 552a) – Although this law
applies mainly to federal agencies, the misuse of personal information provided
for housing purposes, such as your phone number, may breach common-law privacy
protections or other applicable state statutes.
Violation: Rick
Newmann's intrusive behavior (e.g., peering through windows and unsolicited
contact using my private phone number) is a direct breach of my legal right to
privacy under Minnesota law, as well as broader principles of privacy protected
by state and federal law.
(B) Violation Of Anti-Discrimination
Protections (Legal Basis)
Fair
Housing Act (FHA) (42 U.S.C. §§ 3601-3619): The
FHA prohibits discrimination in housing on the basis of race, disability, and
gender. Harassment that creates a hostile living environment, especially when
tied to a tenant’s protected status (e.g., race or gender), is a form of
housing discrimination.
Minnesota
Human Rights Act (MHRA) (Minn. Stat. § 363A.09) –
Prohibits discrimination and harassment in housing based on race, disability,
and sex. The MHRA explicitly covers harassment by landlords or property
managers that interferes with a tenant's right to enjoy their rental property.
Violation: Newmann’s
harassment, intimidation, and refusal to address reasonable accommodation
concerns (e.g., pest control and safe housing conditions) have created a
hostile environment based on race, disability, and gender, in violation of both
the FHA and MHRA.
(C) Violation of Disability Rights (Legal
Basis)
Americans
with Disabilities Act (ADA) (42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.) – The
ADA requires reasonable accommodations to ensure individuals with disabilities
have equal access to housing.
Section
504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. § 794) –
Prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities in programs
receiving federal assistance, which may include housing programs.
Minn.
Stat. § 363A.10 – Requires landlords to make reasonable
accommodations for tenants with disabilities.
Violation: The
property owner and onsite manager’s failure to address severe living
conditions—such as infestation, odors from animal neglect, and refusal to
contact exterminators—constitutes a refusal to provide reasonable
accommodations for my disability. This neglect exacerbates my physical and
mental health, violating federal and state disability rights laws.
(D) Violation of Right to Safe and
Habitable Housing (Legal Basis)
Minn.
Stat. § 504B.161 – Imposes a duty on landlords to ensure
that rental properties are fit for habitation and meet basic safety and health
standards. Persistent infestations, pervasive odors, and untreated maintenance
issues breach this covenant.
Violation: By
failing to address the infestation, animal waste, and overall unsafe
conditions, Newmann and the property owner have violated the implied warranty
of habitability, leaving me to endure unsafe and unsanitary living conditions.
(E) Violation of Protections Against
Retaliation (Legal Basis)
Minn.
Stat. § 504B.441 – Prohibits landlords from retaliating
against tenants who report code violations or exercise their legal rights.
Violation: Newmann’s
escalating harassment and intimidation, including unsolicited messages and
coercion, represent retaliatory actions against me for asserting my rights as a
tenant and reporting property issues.
(F) Violation of Sexual
Harassment Protections (Legal Basis)
Fair
Housing Act – Sexual harassment that creates a hostile
housing environment is a form of discrimination under the FHA.
Minn.
Stat. § 363A.10 – Covers sexual harassment in housing,
which includes unwelcome sexual advances or conduct that interferes with a
tenant's housing rights.
Violation: Newmann’s
repeated sexual harassment, including unsolicited contact and coercive
behavior, violates my rights under the FHA and the MHRA. These actions
constitute a hostile housing environment that interferes with my right to enjoy
my rental unit.
(G) Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Abuse of
Position (Legal Basis)
Minnesota
common law establishes that property managers have a duty to act in good faith
and protect tenants’ interests.
Violation: Using
my private contact information for personal harassment, failing to address
health and safety concerns, and prioritizing his own image over tenant welfare
represent breaches of fiduciary duty and abuse of his position as a property
manager.
Summary of Violations
Rick Newmann’s actions infringe upon your rights under Minnesota law, including your
right to privacy, safe and habitable housing, and protections from
discrimination, harassment, and retaliation. Additionally, his conduct breaches
federal laws, such as the Fair Housing Act and the Americans with Disabilities
Act, that protect your rights as a Black, disabled woman. These violations
demand accountability through legal action or administrative remedies.
PRINTED EXHIBITS OF TEXT
Comments
Post a Comment
Thank you for your feedback!