SECTION 4 TITLE 4.5 HOSTILE ENVIRONMENT OF NEPOTISM, NEGLECT AND GENDER-BASED DISCRIMINATION (POLICE)
WALLS OF SILENCE
SECTION 4 TITLE 4.5 HOSTILE LIVING ENVIRONMENT (POLICE)
On August 20, 2024, I
contacted Animal Control to report neglect and unsafe conditions involving
animals in my living environment. To my dismay, instead of responding to the
scene, my call was forwarded to the police. The police contacted me by phone
rather than visiting the property to assess the situation. During these calls,
my concerns were repeatedly dismissed, and the urgency of my request was
reduced to "there is nothing we can do."
I emphasized the importance
of having a police report for documentation purposes and requested they come to
the scene. I was informed that an officer would come out around 1pm
(several hours later). The police called again, informing me that my request
was again postponed with a vague promise of action "later" today and
that the matter was passed on to the police chief, someone the apartment
manager had casually mentioned as a close friend of theirs just five months
earlier, in April. Neither Animal Control nor the police ultimately came out to
provide the report I needed—critical
documentation that would enable me to seek assistance and begin the process of
leaving the environment. I do not possess the health or resilience to endure
this kind of bureaucratic runaround. With high blood pressure and medical
documentation indicating I am at risk of a stroke, these prolonged and
dismissive interactions exacerbate my health risks. Additionally, I suffer from
Legal Abuse Syndrome PTSD, which significantly impairs my ability to navigate
repeated and unproductive exchanges with authorities or service providers.
These barriers have life-threatening implications for me. All I needed was
straightforward evidence of the situation—something to provide to the professionals
supporting me. The continuous dismissal of my urgent circumstances delayed my
ability to leave a dangerous and uninhabitable environment, potentially
jeopardizing my health further.
REFUSAL TO PROVIDE A
REPORT
The refusal of Animal
Control and the police to respond in person and document the conditions
ultimately delayed my ability to leave the environment. This lack of urgency
and the denial of basic support ensured I remained trapped in a space that
worsened my already fragile health.
OUTCOME
Instead of immediate
intervention, a "friendly" 30-day period was given to the property
owner to address infestations and clean up the animal waste. An inspector was
scheduled to visit after this grace period. When the inspector finally arrived
on September 20, 2024, they insisted on taking a single photo in my unit—one that intentionally
included me in the frame, despite my visibly sickened condition caused by the
environment.
SYSTEMATIC
"PATTERN" TARGETING
This series of events
highlights a troubling pattern: efforts by authorities to shield property
owners by helping them "clean up" before evidence can be properly
documented. This conduct mirrors what I reported happening with housing
authorities in healthcare matters before I left the state—a protective action that
ultimately brought me to this location.
Their actions—or deliberate inaction—feel calculated, part of a larger, familiar system of shielding those in power while leaving individuals like me to bear the consequences alone.
LEGAL RESPONDER
Based on your account,
several potential violations and areas of concern arise, including possible
violations of your rights as a disabled person, a tenant, and someone seeking
accountability from local authorities. Here's a breakdown:
1. RIGHTS AS A DISABLED
PERSON (ADA VIOLATIONS)
Ø Failure to Accommodate: Authorities (Animal Control, police) failed to provide reasonable accommodations despite being aware of your disabilities and health risks. Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), public entities must accommodate disabled individuals to ensure equal access to services.
Ø Compounded
Harm:
The delays and dismissive responses exacerbated your health risks, potentially
violating protections afforded under the ADA and Fair Housing Act.
2. HOUSING RIGHTS
Ø Uninhabitable Conditions: Under Minnesota’s landlord-tenant laws, tenants have the right to habitable living conditions. Severe infestations, animal neglect, and unsafe environmental conditions may constitute a violation of the "implied warranty of habitability."
Ø Retaliation
Risk:
If your landlord or property management retaliates against you for reporting
these conditions, that would be a violation of tenant protection laws.
3. POLICE AND ANIMAL
CONTROL NEGLECT
Ø Failure to Act: The refusal to respond or provide documentation may constitute neglect of duty, especially given the impact on your ability to pursue further action.
Ø Conflict
of Interest: The mention of a connection between the
apartment manager and the police chief raises concerns about bias or
corruption, particularly if that relationship influenced their response.
4. EMOTIONAL DISTRESS AND
LEGAL ABUSE
Ø Legal
Abuse Syndrome: The compounded trauma of dismissal,
delays, and unproductive exchanges may further qualify as emotional distress.
This exacerbation of existing PTSD could strengthen any claims of negligence or
misconduct.
ACTIONS YOU SHOULD CONSIDER
DOCUMENT EVERYTHING
Ø Preserve all records, including communication logs, medical documentation, and photographs of the conditions.
Ø Note
the dates, times, and content of your calls with authorities, along with any
promises they made and failed to keep.
FILE FORMAL COMPLAINTS
Ø Animal
Control and Police: Submit a written complaint detailing their
neglect and request an internal review.
Ø ADA Compliance Office: Report the failure to accommodate your disability to the Department of Justice (DOJ) or Minnesota’s human rights commission.
Ø HUD
Complaint: If the uninhabitable conditions violate your Section 8
housing rights, file a complaint with the Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD).
REACH OUT TO LEGAL AID
Ø Contact Legal Aid Services of Minnesota, which specializes in housing and disability law, for assistance in addressing landlord negligence and holding authorities accountable.
Ø They
can help determine whether you have grounds for a lawsuit based on ADA
violations, tenant rights breaches, or emotional distress claims.
CONTACT ADVOCACY GROUPS
Ø Disability advocacy groups can assist with ADA claims and provide additional support.
Ø Tenant
advocacy organizations in Minnesota can guide you on enforcing your housing
rights.
MEDIA OR COMMUNITY PRESSURE
Ø If
internal complaints are ignored, consider bringing attention to your case
through local media or community advocacy organizations.
PREPARE FOR HEALTH AND
SAFETY MOVES
Ø Work
with healthcare providers and housing advocates to secure a safer environment
while pursuing these complaints.
YOUR RIGHTS AND WHAT TO EMPHASIZE
Ø The ADA and Fair Housing Act protect you from discrimination and require accommodations for your disabilities.
Ø Minnesota’s landlord-tenant laws ensure the right to habitable housing.
Ø Authorities
have a duty to act reasonably, investigate complaints, and provide
documentation when requested.
Taking these steps can help
hold the responsible parties accountable and protect your rights moving
forward.
EVIDENCE
UPDATE: SECOND ENCOUNTER
Incident Report
November
4, 2024
On November 4, 2024, I had to walk
further into the city, heading toward City Hall for another errand. The
journey, as always, was grueling, but what stood out most was my encounter with
the local police; I saw him in the truck—he slowed down and went
around the block.
On my way to City Hall, I passed by the
police office. I’m sure it was the same officer who had ignored my calls for
help on August 20, 2024, so he saw me twice during my walk there and once again
as I made my walk back to the property.
Not long after, police officer Carter
Cook, began calling and leaving voicemails.
Abuse
Of Soulaani Personal Data & Assertion Of Boundaries By In Non-Police Matter
Routed To Police.
He calls me on a different phone number
than the number provided to Animal Control back on August 20, 2024 and I have
not provided permission for this number to be used for any purposes or by any
other people than who that number was provided to.
The voicemail from Officer Carter Cook
was yet another jarring chapter in the ongoing saga of my life in this hostile
environment. He claimed to have received a copy of my legal affidavit—a document about my housing situation
that a city inspector instructed me to file with City Hall, which City Hall
assured me would be forwarded to the City Attorney. Yet, somehow, this
affidavit found its way into the hands of a police officer, who then decided to
call me on my personal number.
Let’s
be clear: at no point did I initiate any police interaction—not on August 20, 2024, not in October
2024, and not on November 4, 2024. But here we are: the same police department
that declined to protect me when I requested their help is now actively
pursuing me.
Priorities of a Broken
System
While Officer Cook leaves messages about
an affidavit that should not have been supplied to him, no one is addressing
the criminality I’ve
reported:
- Sexual
harassment
- Property
theft and destruction
- Stalking
- Battery
- Animal
neglect
- An
uninhabitable, nuisance property
The evidence is overwhelming—photos, reports, and public
documentation—but the
system is entirely unresponsive to these complaints. Instead, they focus their
energy on monitoring and pursuing me like a suspect.
Legal Abuse Syndrome Vent
Crime is chronically and systematically
imposed upon me without any legal recourse to stop it. It is Minnesotans,
placed in the very employment positions meant to protect me, who are committing
all the acts that harm me. Even leaving has been made impossible.
“This system is all over me—all the
time—without justification, without respectful observation of my right to
personal boundaries, autonomy, privacy, and dignity—while refusing to enforce a
policy, regulation or law that I’m rightfully entitled to enact. Because I’ve
never had justice, I cannot get them off of me or away from me. As a result of
crimes left uncorrected, I’m constantly placed in environments where systematic
workers and crises are encountered.”
Even moving across the country hasn’t
freed me from its grip, as they followed me and electronically sabotaged me
nationally in an effort to ensure the history doesn’t get out.
It’s the oddest reality—not only to
witness but to be the target and victim of an entity that does not quit. It
does not self-correct. It has not been ordered to correct itself. One
uncorrected act feeds into another to cover the former, and the latter just
gets worse and worse.
Why even do things so fearful of others
finding out about that we would spend so many resources avoiding public
accountability or risking public reputation for? Is there no shame in
systematically targeting kids for destruction—kids who are just kids? Natural-born
Minnesota citizens who get sick and do the normal thing of seeking help?
What do they know about me that I don’t
know about myself to make this lifelong pursuit worth all this nonsense?
What—The—@#$%, Minnesota?
Smh. I’m so exhausted and disgusted. The
amount of praying I have to do without ceasing—because I am equally concerned
about what I might snap and do to others as much as I am concerned about all
that is actively being done to me—is overwhelming. I’m only human.
How dare they prevent me from leaving a
dangerous, injurious environment when I independently possessed all I needed to
leave and be well?
Everyone else is free to experience
being free of exposure to or victimization from abuse, violence, drugs, and
dangerous environments—except me?
How dare they continue to maneuver these
environments and exposures through criminal means: controlling my environment,
controlling my health, controlling my social opportunities, manipulating my
public reputation through falsely curated experiences and fraudulent
narratives, and blocking financial independence and education that was
accessible the entire time—since I was a six-year-old child?
How dare Minnesotans or the United
States allow any American to remain in such captivity with criminals for so
long?
I need justice for this apartment right
now, and that will be a new first step toward moving into “normality.”
The
voicemails
His first message was vague, expressing
a desire to “talk.” I didn’t answer. His second message came
shortly after, but I still didn’t
pick up. After enduring 12 months of neglect, isolation, and abandonment, I
couldn’t bring myself to re-engage with the
very system that had left me stranded in a hostile environment. The affidavit,
which detailed the unresolved issues at the property, had been in City Hall’s possession for nearly a month at this
point. I couldn’t help but
suspect that his sudden interest had more to do with protecting themselves than
with addressing my concerns. After all, the affidavit directly implicated the
police in their failure to act. Even if his intent was to apologize, I didn’t need or want it. What I wanted—what I needed—was to leave that rental property safely
and move on with my life. I was no longer willing to expend energy on a system
that had consistently proven itself indifferent to my well-being. When he
called a third time, I let it go to voicemail again. For me, there was no point
in engaging. My focus was on survival and finding a way out of this nightmare,
not rehashing events with those who had already shown they wouldn’t help.
LETTING GO
By this point, I had detached
emotionally from the property and everything that had happened there. My energy
was spent, and my only priority was getting out in one piece. Whether their
newfound concern was genuine or self-serving, it no longer mattered.
I refused to let their calls distract me
from my singular goal: to move on, to leave the chaos and neglect behind, and
to rebuild my life somewhere far from the shadow of their indifference.
OUTCOME
No movement—like every encounter. Anxiety triggered, Blood pressure
increase.
UPDATE: THIRD ENCOUNTER
Comments
Post a Comment
Thank you for your feedback!